For nations blogor Publications Not everything is permitted
Text of Janez Janša entitled dvorišta "God is not. Everything is permitted ", published two weeks ago on the website of the SDS, he left me cold. Over the years I have grown unaccustomed deliberately upset because of bad texts - let alone texts, dvorišta which simply dvorišta do not agree. dvorišta However, it was clear that the reactions to it from other political and media banks of the tumultuous and angry and that will tell the Slovenian political scene more than the trigger itself. Including the author's reaction to the reaction.
What is Janša wrote, in essence, is nothing more than moralistic texts, like today - when hovering over us dog zeitgeist, mixed with social, economic and political dvorišta despondency - abound in any print or online media. The difference lies in the fact that this particular write champion of the opposition and that is not only moralizing but also mobilizatorski.
Let me get right to the title. I think it's appropriate for the text - which does not mean that it is good. Is intellectualistic pompous in reliance on the alleged irrefutable philosophical argument, but it really is more literary and makes it possible to argue almost every ethical question. dvorišta But this is no big deal: most of the titles in the Slovenian press and on the internet that are trying to overcome the basic message of the text is also bad, probably worse.
It's more fun in all this is that three years ago under identical address published in the Journal interview with - of all people! - Gregor pigeon. It was derived from the statement: "Berlusconizacija becomes the truth so-called relaxed Slovenia, according to Dostoevsky clearly ungodly, because everything is allowed."
Even more fun is that Golobič - as a late note - me (in his own words by "inappropriate") compared with Drnovsek: this is the "next Crnkovič the only one who is able to brezrezervno distance himself from his yesterday's statement: Drnovsek therefore, because it is so committed to the content, Crnkovič, because it is so absolved. "
Should I continue. In Janša text I spontaneously grinned at the next sentence: "Not them [members of the elite transition] enough to abuse the system and people are not safe from them nor pets."
So do not buy this. Still less can I buy sentence: "blessed water, to which selected members of sprinkly transition elite is not clear, but red colored. Is blood. "It's already on the other side of the border of good taste for style of writing, in particular, the logic of transferring the blame for the actions of others.
In the minds of leftists dvorišta and liberals exists Index textorum et izjavorum prohibitorum. Criteria for inclusion on the list of shame are not just arbitrary, dvorišta and even fewer are specified. The main criterion is the list of authors that they include it by default. This list Janša not only, but of course the first - and for him a long one.
I know that is not correct polemics with fellow columnists in the same newspaper, but I can not pass Miheljakove columns last Wednesday. (I promise that's the last time.) Author is paraphrased entitled "JJ is in opposition. Everything dvorišta is permitted "- namely, better than the original, it has to admit - cash bar Janša. I address dvorišta you interpret it differently: if Janša says something or God forbid even write, dvorišta everything is allowed. Anything. It is permitted even to text, which you do not agree - but no matter how moralistic, biased, pathetic, demagogic, for me as funny - insignia branding for a "vile and primitive", "worth more psychiatric than political analysis" and compare it with the "Nazi propaganda film". When it comes to Janša, is also allowed personal lynching (character assassination).
The discussion on the draft Family Code this week showed that debate practically no longer possible. And not only in parliament. I have always been listening to the calls to the culture of dialogue, and finally left bare abusive. With both sides. In this sense, the controversy Spomenka Hribar with Janša in the previous Objektiv a high standard of culture. But even I have a problem with it. Why must - not only, of course - always pull the plan Anton Mahnič and swinging it as a negative example for irreconcilable conflicts? Does not this "ideological manipulation" such as herself complains Janša? Is it so difficult to hold, and say only that Janša is wrong? Or some other time again spomenka? Or Katarina? <
This confusion of public wrangling over me not like because it leads to arrogance militantizem with no arguments, the face of which was the old conflict between liberals and clericals benign café discussions. How are you feeling, dear compatriots, you agree with people who zmerjajo those with whom you disagree? And how do you feel when you do not agree with the arguments of those who contest the opinion with which you disagree?
Posted on Monday, March 8, 2010 at 9:52 in the category Log 2004-, Columns. Publication may comment or leave with your blog trackback. 157 comments to "Not everything is permitted" nevenka says: March 8, 2010 at 10:03
Well, if you thought, probably not
Text of Janez Janša entitled dvorišta "God is not. Everything is permitted ", published two weeks ago on the website of the SDS, he left me cold. Over the years I have grown unaccustomed deliberately upset because of bad texts - let alone texts, dvorišta which simply dvorišta do not agree. dvorišta However, it was clear that the reactions to it from other political and media banks of the tumultuous and angry and that will tell the Slovenian political scene more than the trigger itself. Including the author's reaction to the reaction.
What is Janša wrote, in essence, is nothing more than moralistic texts, like today - when hovering over us dog zeitgeist, mixed with social, economic and political dvorišta despondency - abound in any print or online media. The difference lies in the fact that this particular write champion of the opposition and that is not only moralizing but also mobilizatorski.
Let me get right to the title. I think it's appropriate for the text - which does not mean that it is good. Is intellectualistic pompous in reliance on the alleged irrefutable philosophical argument, but it really is more literary and makes it possible to argue almost every ethical question. dvorišta But this is no big deal: most of the titles in the Slovenian press and on the internet that are trying to overcome the basic message of the text is also bad, probably worse.
It's more fun in all this is that three years ago under identical address published in the Journal interview with - of all people! - Gregor pigeon. It was derived from the statement: "Berlusconizacija becomes the truth so-called relaxed Slovenia, according to Dostoevsky clearly ungodly, because everything is allowed."
Even more fun is that Golobič - as a late note - me (in his own words by "inappropriate") compared with Drnovsek: this is the "next Crnkovič the only one who is able to brezrezervno distance himself from his yesterday's statement: Drnovsek therefore, because it is so committed to the content, Crnkovič, because it is so absolved. "
Should I continue. In Janša text I spontaneously grinned at the next sentence: "Not them [members of the elite transition] enough to abuse the system and people are not safe from them nor pets."
So do not buy this. Still less can I buy sentence: "blessed water, to which selected members of sprinkly transition elite is not clear, but red colored. Is blood. "It's already on the other side of the border of good taste for style of writing, in particular, the logic of transferring the blame for the actions of others.
In the minds of leftists dvorišta and liberals exists Index textorum et izjavorum prohibitorum. Criteria for inclusion on the list of shame are not just arbitrary, dvorišta and even fewer are specified. The main criterion is the list of authors that they include it by default. This list Janša not only, but of course the first - and for him a long one.
I know that is not correct polemics with fellow columnists in the same newspaper, but I can not pass Miheljakove columns last Wednesday. (I promise that's the last time.) Author is paraphrased entitled "JJ is in opposition. Everything dvorišta is permitted "- namely, better than the original, it has to admit - cash bar Janša. I address dvorišta you interpret it differently: if Janša says something or God forbid even write, dvorišta everything is allowed. Anything. It is permitted even to text, which you do not agree - but no matter how moralistic, biased, pathetic, demagogic, for me as funny - insignia branding for a "vile and primitive", "worth more psychiatric than political analysis" and compare it with the "Nazi propaganda film". When it comes to Janša, is also allowed personal lynching (character assassination).
The discussion on the draft Family Code this week showed that debate practically no longer possible. And not only in parliament. I have always been listening to the calls to the culture of dialogue, and finally left bare abusive. With both sides. In this sense, the controversy Spomenka Hribar with Janša in the previous Objektiv a high standard of culture. But even I have a problem with it. Why must - not only, of course - always pull the plan Anton Mahnič and swinging it as a negative example for irreconcilable conflicts? Does not this "ideological manipulation" such as herself complains Janša? Is it so difficult to hold, and say only that Janša is wrong? Or some other time again spomenka? Or Katarina? <
This confusion of public wrangling over me not like because it leads to arrogance militantizem with no arguments, the face of which was the old conflict between liberals and clericals benign café discussions. How are you feeling, dear compatriots, you agree with people who zmerjajo those with whom you disagree? And how do you feel when you do not agree with the arguments of those who contest the opinion with which you disagree?
Posted on Monday, March 8, 2010 at 9:52 in the category Log 2004-, Columns. Publication may comment or leave with your blog trackback. 157 comments to "Not everything is permitted" nevenka says: March 8, 2010 at 10:03
Well, if you thought, probably not
No comments:
Post a Comment